Last Updated on April 15, 2024 by Ossian Muscad
Delivering a project successfully is crucial to the success of any business. For your project to be successful, you must understand its delivery and how it works clearly. It might seem like a simple topic, but proper delivery and turnover of projects are crucial to project success.
This comprehensive guide will teach you everything you need to know about project delivery, from the different delivery methods to the challenges you may face along the way. With this guide, you’ll be able to turn over your projects confidently and ensure their success!
What is Project Delivery?
Project delivery refers to the process of completing a project from start to finish. This includes all the steps necessary to complete the project, from planning and design to implementation and testing. It’s a complex process that requires careful planning and execution. There are many different project delivery methods, and the right method for your project will depend on its nature and your specific needs.
People Involved in Project Delivery
Successful project delivery hinges on the collaboration and competency of a diverse team of professionals. From project managers to technical architects, each member plays a pivotal role in ensuring the project’s aims are met with precision and efficiency. The project delivery process involves the following key personnel
Project Owner
The Project Owner, often considered the project’s sponsor, is primarily responsible for initiating and funding the project. This role involves setting the project’s objectives, determining the overall scope, and ensuring that the project aligns with the organization’s strategic goals. The Project Owner is critical in decision-making processes, particularly in approving project deliverables and changes within the project scope. They also play a major role in stakeholder management, keeping all parties informed and engaged throughout the project lifecycle.
Designer
Designers are tasked with bringing the Project Owner’s vision to life. They are responsible for creating the project’s design and ensuring that it meets the owner’s requirements, regulatory standards, and industry best practices. Designers typically work closely with the Project Owner and Project Manager to refine the project’s scope and are integral in the planning and development phase. Their output includes detailed drawings, specifications, and documents necessary for the project’s implementation.
Project Manager
The Project Manager is the linchpin of the project delivery process and is responsible for overseeing and coordinating all project activities from inception to completion. This role encompasses a wide range of duties, including project planning, scheduling, budget management, resource allocation, and quality control. Project Managers ensure that projects are delivered on time, within budget, and to the agreed-upon quality standards. They also serve as the primary communication hub between the project’s various stakeholders, reporting on progress and navigating any issues that arise.
Contractor
Contractors are the entities or individuals responsible for executing the work outlined in the project’s plans and specifications. Their work involves managing construction activities, procuring materials, and employing subcontractors to complete specific tasks. Contractors must ensure that all work is performed to the specifications set out by the Designer within the constraints of the project’s timeline and budget. Effective Contractors are skilled in project management themselves, often employing project managers or site supervisors to ensure the smooth running of site operations and adherence to safety standards.
Phases of Project Delivery
Whether it’s a small-scale or a large-scale project, the project delivery process generally consists of the following phases:
Planning
Every project starts with planning. In this phase, the project team develops a plan outlining all the tasks that must be completed to achieve the project’s objectives. They also establish a project schedule, set milestones and deadlines, and determine the necessary resources. A comprehensive project plan features the following elements:
- Project scope
- Goals and objectives
- Work plan and structure breakdown
- Stakeholder analysis
- Schedule plan and management
- Reporting and communications structure
- Risk assessment and management
Design
After the project plan is approved, the project moves into the design phase. In this phase, the project team develops the project’s designs and specifications. The project’s designs are developed in accordance with the project’s scope and objectives. In some cases, a project plan can involve a business case that includes the following aspects:
- Estimated timetable and budget
- Deliverables (project management, technicals, etc.)
- Design specifications (drawings, drafts, exhibits, etc.)
Implementation
Once the project’s designs are approved, the project moves into the implementation phase. In this phase, the project team carries out the project’s tasks and activities. First, the project team works to implement the project according to the project’s designs and specifications.
Construction and monitoring typically take place at this phase. The contractors will work on the job site to construct the project according to the project’s designs. The project manager will monitor the progress and ensure it is on track. Once the project is complete, the team carries out necessary tests and inspections to ensure that everything meets quality standards and specifications.
Delivery Close-Out
Project delivery doesn’t end when the project is completed. In fact, the project only truly ends when the owner and all stakeholders have accepted the project’s deliverables and are satisfied. The project team will then hand over the project to the project owner and close out the project. The delivery close-out phase wraps up all the tasks and activities related to the project delivery, such as the following:
- Accomplishing all administrative requirements.
- Performance assessment against the goals and objectives in the planning phase.
- Recordkeeping of the lessons and other essential aspects learned throughout the process.
- Evaluating team performance.
Methods of Project Delivery
There are several methods of project delivery, each with its advantages and disadvantages. Understanding these methods can help the project team determine which type of project delivery suits their project best. The most common methods of project delivery are as follows:
Design-Bid-Build (DBB)
The Design-Bid-Build project delivery method is the most common project delivery method. In this method, the project owner contracts with a design firm to develop the project’s designs. Once the designs are completed, the project owner contracts with a construction company to build the project. Here’s an overview of the process:
- The designer crafts the blueprints and detailed specifications in alignment with the owner’s objectives and vision. This step ensures that the project’s conceptual ideas are translated into detailed, actionable plans that can guide the construction phase accurately and efficiently.
- After finalizing the design, the project enters the bidding phase. General contractors present their proposals, enabling the owner to choose the most advantageous bid from the pool. This competitive process aims to find a balance between cost, quality, and the contractor’s capability to deliver on the project’s requirements.
- The chosen contractor begins work on the project. With the contract awarded, the construction phase begins. The contractor, leveraging their expertise and resources, manages the construction site, procures materials, and coordinates with subcontractors to ensure the project is built according to the agreed-upon specifications, timeline, and budget.
Pros of Design-Bid-Build (DBB)
- Clear Project Phases: The DBB method offers a straightforward project timeline with distinct phases (design, bid, build), making it easier for project owners to understand and monitor.
- Competitive Bidding: Separating the design and construction contracts allows for competitive bidding on the construction part, potentially lowering costs.
- Simplified Design Changes: As the design and construction phases are distinct, changes in design are easier to manage and approve before the construction phase begins.
Cons of Design-Bid-Build (DBB)
- Time-Consuming: The sequential nature of DBB can lead to a longer project timeline, as each phase must be completed before the next one begins.
- Potential for Increased Costs Due to Changes: Any changes after the bidding phase can result in costly amendments to contracts and delays in project timelines.
- Lack of Contractor Input During Design Phase: The contractor’s absence during the design phase may result in a disconnect between design and practical implementation, potentially leading to issues during construction.
Best for
The Design-Bid-Build method is best suited for projects where the scope and specifications are well-defined before the bidding process begins. It is particularly effective for straightforward projects without the need for complex, specialized construction techniques. Projects that can benefit from competitive bidding to lower costs and where the project owner desires a high degree of control over each phase will find DBB an advantageous approach.
Design-Build (DB)
The Design-Build project delivery method, where a single entity is responsible for both designing and constructing a project, is gaining traction across various industries. This approach simplifies the project owner’s responsibilities by providing them with a single point of contact, potentially reducing the project timeline and overall costs. It fosters a collaborative environment between the design and construction teams, leading to more innovative solutions and efficient problem-solving during the project lifecycle.
This method contrasts with the traditional design-bid-build approach, where design and construction services are split between separate entities, often leading to increased complexity and possible conflicts. As such, the design-build method is becoming a preferred choice for project owners seeking streamlined, effective project delivery.
Pros of Design-Build (DB)
- Streamlined Process: The integration of design and construction services streamlines project delivery, enabling faster completion times by overlapping the design and construction phases.
- Single Point of Responsibility: Having a single entity responsible for both design and construction simplifies communication and decision-making, reducing the likelihood of disputes and miscommunications between separate design and construction teams.
- Cost and Time Efficiency: The collaborative nature of the design-build approach can lead to cost savings through more accurate budgeting during the design phase and reduced administrative burden. Additionally, potential issues can be identified and addressed earlier, preventing costly delays and modifications during construction.
Cons of Design-Build (DB)
- Limited Competitive Bidding: The bundled approach of design and construction limits the owner’s ability to compare different design proposals, potentially leading to less competitive pricing for the project.
- Reduced Owner Control: The project owner may have less control over the design details, as the design-build firm handles both design and construction. This can be a disadvantage for owners who wish to be closely involved in design decisions.
- Potential for Design Compromise: In the interest of ensuring constructability or staying within budget, there is a risk that the design aspect might be compromised or not as innovative, especially if cost-cutting measures dominate the project’s execution.
Best for
The Design-Build method is particularly suited for projects requiring fast-track construction or those with a tight schedule, as it can significantly reduce project delivery time. It is also beneficial for projects where the owner is looking for a turnkey solution with minimal involvement in the day-to-day management of the design and construction process. This approach is ideal for owners who prioritize the ease of having a single point of contact over having control over every detail of the design and construction phases.
Construction Management at Risk (CMAR)
The Construction Management at Risk project delivery method is similar to the Design-Bid-Build method. In this method, the project owner contracts with a construction management firm to provide preconstruction services. Once the project’s designs are completed, the construction management firm contracts with a construction company to build the project. In this approach, the owner supplies the initial design and delegates the management responsibilities to the Construction Manager (CM). From this point forward, the CM will oversee the remaining process:
- Consulting Designers for Their Design Plans: The CM works closely with designers to ensure the project’s design aligns with the owner’s vision and project requirements.
- Creating the Process Timeline: Developing a comprehensive timeline that outlines all critical milestones and deadlines for the project to ensure timely completion.
- Calculating the Greatest Maximum Price (GMP): The CM calculates the GMP, which represents the total cost ceiling for the project, including costs for labor, materials, and additional expenses.
- Tracking the Budget and Not Exceeding the GMP: The CM monitors the project’s financial health, ensuring that all expenses stay within the predetermined GMP.
- Selecting Contractors That Meet the Owner’s Needs: The CM chooses contractors based on their expertise, reliability, and ability to meet the project’s specifications and quality standards.
- Overseeing the Quality of Work During Construction: The CM supervises construction to ensure that all work meets or exceeds the quality expectations and complies with the project’s design.
- Coordinating Any Changes Required by the Owner: The CM serves as the primary point of contact for any design or construction changes requested by the owner, managing the necessary adjustments efficiently to minimize impact on the project timeline and budget.
Pros of Design-Bid-Build (DBB)
- Clear Separation of Design and Construction: DBB allows for a distinct separation between the design phase and the construction phase, providing the owner with full visibility and control over the design before any construction begins.
- Competitive Bidding: This method allows for competitive bidding during the construction phase, which can lower construction costs as contractors bid for the project.
- Increased Owner Control: The owner plays a more significant role in selecting both the designer and the contractor, providing them with greater control over the project’s design and construction quality.
Cons of Design-Bid-Build (DBB)
- Lengthy Process: The sequential phases can lead to longer project durations since construction cannot begin until the design is fully completed and a contractor is selected.
- Potential for Increased Costs and Conflicts: Changes or discrepancies in the project’s design during the construction phase can lead to costly modifications and potential conflicts between the designer and contractor.
- Less Flexibility: Once the construction contract is awarded, making changes to the design can be difficult and expensive, as changes may require renegotiating contracts and can result in delays and additional costs.
Best for
The Design-Bid-Build process is best suited for projects where the owner wishes to have complete control over the design and a clear understanding of the project’s specifications before any construction begins. It is ideal for projects with a less urgent timeline and for owners who value the ability to thoroughly assess and refine the project’s design and specifications through a competitive bid process. This method allows owners to separate the design and construction contracts, providing an opportunity to select the best candidates for both roles based on their specific requirements and qualifications.
Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)
The Integrated project delivery method is a relatively new method. In this method, the project owner contracts with a design-build firm to develop the project’s designs and build the project. However, in this method, the project team members work together from the beginning of the project to the end.
Pros of Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)
- Collaborative Process: IPD facilitates a highly collaborative environment where all stakeholders (owner, designer, contractor) work together from the project’s inception to its completion. This integrated approach fosters innovation, efficiency, and a shared responsibility for the project’s success.
- Enhanced Communication: The IPD method ensures that communication lines are always open among all parties involved, reducing the likelihood of misunderstandings and errors. This continuous dialogue helps in making informed decisions quickly and effectively.
- Cost and Time Savings: By involving all key participants early in the process, IPD can lead to significant cost and time savings. The collaborative effort helps identify and solve problems early, reducing the need for changes and rework during later stages.
- Shared Risk and Reward: IPD often involves shared risk and reward contracts, which align the interests of all parties towards the project’s objectives. This model encourages all members to focus on achieving the best outcomes as efficiently as possible.
Cons of Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)
- Complexity in Contracts: The contractual agreements in IPD can be complex, requiring clear definitions of roles and responsibilities and sharing of risk and reward. This complexity necessitates thorough understanding and careful negotiation by all parties.
- Requires High Level of Trust: The success of an IPD project largely depends on the mutual trust among its participants. Building and maintaining this level of trust requires effort and time, and it may be challenging if parties have not previously worked together.
- Limited Flexibility for Owner: The owner commits to the team and the project’s path early in the process, which can limit their ability to make significant changes as the project progresses without impacting the project’s dynamics and potentially incurring additional costs.
Best for
Integrated Project Delivery is best suited for complex projects where collaboration between the design and construction teams can bring added value, reducing errors and aligning goals from the start. It’s ideal for owners who are willing to be actively involved in the process and prefer a more holistic approach to project delivery, focusing on outcomes rather than just the bottom line. IPD is particularly beneficial for projects with innovative or unique elements, requiring close collaboration to solve challenges creatively. This approach is also fitting for projects where time and cost savings are a priority, and the owner is ready to share risks and rewards with their project partners.
Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT)
The Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) project delivery method is a form of public-private partnership that allows for the efficient execution and management of large-scale infrastructure projects. In this method, a private entity or consortium is responsible for financing, constructing, and then operating a facility for a specified period.
This period is often long enough to allow the private party to recoup its investment, plus a reasonable profit, through the operation of the project. After this time, ownership of the project is transferred to the public sector, usually at no cost.
BOT arrangements are commonly used in sectors such as transportation (e.g., roads, bridges, tunnels) and public utilities (e.g., water treatment plants, power plants). This model incentivizes the private sector to complete projects on time and within budget while also ensuring that the facility is well maintained and efficiently operated throughout the contract, ultimately benefiting the public.
Pros of Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT)
- Incentivizes Efficiency: BOT projects incentivize the private sector to design, build, and operate projects efficiently, as their return on investment is directly linked to the project’s success.
- Access to Private Sector Capital: This allows government entities to undertake large-scale infrastructure projects without the immediate need for public funds, thereby alleviating the state’s financial burden.
- Risk Transfer: This involves transferring the risks associated with the design, construction, and operation of the facility to the private sector, which is often better equipped to manage these risks.
- Quality and Innovation: The private sector’s involvement can lead to higher-quality and more innovative solutions in project design and operation due to the competitive nature of the procurement process and the drive for efficiency to maximize returns.
Cons of Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT)
- Complex Contract Negotiations: BOT projects require complex and time-consuming negotiations to establish clear and mutually beneficial terms, which can delay project initiation.
- Potential for Higher Costs to Consumers: Since private entities aim to recoup their investments with a profit, there is a risk that the cost to consumers, particularly in utility projects, will be higher than if the project were financed publicly.
- Political and Economic Risks: Changes in government, regulations, or economic conditions can impact long-term BOT projects, potentially leading to disputes or the need for contract renegotiations.
- Limited Public Control: The government may have limited control over the operation and maintenance of the project during the contract period, which can lead to concerns about service quality and availability.
Best for
The Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) model is best suited for large-scale infrastructure projects where upfront capital investments are significant and operational expertise is critical for the project’s long-term success. It is ideal for governments looking to leverage private sector efficiency and innovation without initially bearing the full financial burden. BOT is particularly useful in sectors where infrastructure can be operated profitably over time, such as toll roads, bridges, tunnels, and utility services. This model works well in environments where there is political and economic stability, ensuring that the long-term nature of BOT agreements can be sustained without significant risk of disruption.
Which Method is Right for Your Project?
Choosing the right project delivery method is crucial to the success of your project. Your method will determine how your project is designed, built, and operated. Therefore, you should choose a project delivery method best suited to your project’s needs.
The project manager will work with the project owner to determine the best project delivery method for the project. The project manager will consider the following factors:
- The nature of the project
- The project’s goals and objectives
- The project’s budget
- The project’s timeline
- The skills and experience of the team
- The project’s risks
- The project’s complexity
- The owner’s preferences and needs
- The availability of resources
- The project’s stakeholder engagement strategies
After considering these factors, the project manager and owner will choose the best method for the project. The project manager will ensure that the project is on time, within budget, and on par with quality standards. In addition, the project manager will use their knowledge of project management to plan, execute, and deliver the project.
The project team will work together to design, build, and operate the project. They will use their skills and experience to achieve the project’s goals and objectives. The project owner is responsible for ensuring that the project meets its needs. In addition, the project owner will work with the project manager and project team to achieve the project’s goals and objectives.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q1: What are the key differences between the BOT method and the PPP model?
The BOT method is a form of PPP, but it specifically involves private entities financing, building, and operating a project before transferring it back to the public sector. Conversely, PPPs can involve various arrangements that may not necessarily include the transfer of ownership to the public sector after a set period.
Q2: How is the risk allocation determined in BOT projects?
Risk allocation in BOT projects is typically determined during the contractual negotiation phase. The goal is to allocate each risk to the party best equipped to manage it, ensuring efficiency and project viability. For example, construction risks are often borne by the private entity, while the public sector may retain regulatory or environmental risks.
Q3: Can BOT projects be refinanced or renegotiated during their operation phase?
Yes, BOT projects can be refinanced or renegotiated, especially if there are significant changes in project scope, unforeseen risks, or shifts in economic conditions. Such adjustments require the agreement of all stakeholders and are usually aimed at ensuring the project’s continued viability and mutual benefit.
Q4: What strategies are employed to ensure the project meets its public service obligations during the operation phase?
Typically, performance benchmarks, regular monitoring, and penalties for non-compliance are built into the contract. These mechanisms ensure that the private entity maintains the quality of service required by the public sector agreement, thus safeguarding public interests.
Q5: How do governments ensure they are getting the best value from a BOT project?
Governments employ several strategies to ensure value for money, including competitive bidding processes, comprehensive project due diligence, and engaging independent advisors to evaluate bids. Additionally, clear contract terms, including performance metrics and penalties, are essential for holding the private sector accountable.
Q6: What happens if a BOT project fails or the private entity goes bankrupt?
In the event of bankruptcy or project failure, the contract usually includes pre-defined mechanisms that dictate the course of action. Often, the project may be taken over by the government or tendered to a new private entity. Insurance and guarantees may also be in place to protect the public sector’s interests and ensure project continuity.
Deliver Projects on Time with DATAMYTE
DATAMYTE is a quality management platform with low-code capabilities. Our Digital Clipboard, in particular, is a low-code workflow automation software that features a workflow, checklist, and smart form builder. This tool lets you automate your project management processes, enabling you to deliver projects on time and within budget.
DATAMYTE also lets you conduct layered process audits (LPA), a high-frequency evaluation of critical process steps, focusing on areas with the highest failure risk or non-compliance. Conducting LPA with DATAMYTE lets you effectively identify and correct potential defects before they become major quality issues.
With DATAMYTE, you have an all-in-one solution for project management and quality assurance, helping you deliver successful projects with ease. Try DATAMYTE today and see the difference it makes in your project delivery process. Book a demo now to learn more.
Conclusion
Never take project delivery lightly. You should have a clear understanding of project delivery before starting any project. The choice of a project delivery method can significantly impact the success and efficiency of your project, affecting everything from timeline and budget to overall project quality. It’s crucial to weigh the pros and cons of each delivery method, taking into account the specific requirements and challenges of your project. Remember, the right foundation and approach can make the difference between a project’s success and failure.
